Nothing Ear (3a) review: The price is right, but is the sound?

Nothing is having an interesting year. Having said that, the smartphone world is moving too quickly in terms of inflation, so it's supposedly taking things slower there, yet shows no signs of a similar lull on the audio front. We've already had the good value Headphone (a), so now it's time for some even more affordable earbuds.

The Nothing Ear (3a) look a lot like the brand's Ear (3), unsurprisingly, at least as far as each earbud is concerned. But they're a very different product at a really attractive price point. Do they make that money feel worth it, though? I've used these 'buds for a week straight to find out.

Price and Availability

Nothing has now formally launched the Ear (3a), which means you can order the earbuds direct from its store, or find them on Amazon. They'll set you back £/$99, which makes them a little over half the price of the Nothing Ear (3).

Latest Videos From

Watch full video here:

It also means that, compared to much of the competition, they're a very low-cost option – most rival audio brands have completely separate product lines at this price, albeit with similar features to Nothing's offering (with some exceptions that I'll get into).

Design and Features

From a design perspective, the Nothing Ear (3a) is extremely familiar in two different ways.

Firstly, if you check out the case itself, it's the same as the Nothing Ear (a) with some minor differences; the earbuds themselves are very difficult to tell apart from either the cheaper Ear (a) or pricier Ear (3) models.

Returning to the case for a moment. It's rectangular with rounded corners, but the majority of the actual body is a pill-shaped part within this rectangle. This basically gives the case a lip around the outside, and while I normally really appreciate Nothing's design work, I can't give this much praise.

While it does look striking, it also makes the case a good chunk bigger in your pocket than it needs to be – form over function, which is pretty sinful stuff, I'd say. The lip also makes it actively fiddly to open the case, requiring a fingernail to pry it, and it's annoying to do so one-handed. Again, not ideal.

The earbuds themselves are far more impressive, though, retaining the stem design that Nothing has used on its other earbuds thus far. Selecting the right eartip from four options in the box, I found the fit to be really comfortable and reliable, while the earbuds' stems have that cool transparent look for which the brand is well known.

Image 1 of 2

One final design moan is that, for slightly intangible reasons, these earbuds are the first I've tested in ages where putting them back in the case can be a mixed bag. The placement of the magnets on each stem sometimes sees them grabbed at the wrong angle, requiring a brief fiddle to fix. At least the three-part charging indicator LED is really natty and works great with animations to give you more information.

Where the case was the Ear (3)'s big innovation thanks to an on-board microphone, with the (3a) Nothing has gone a different route. The big change is that the earbuds have on-board storage that can let them directly record audio and phone calls rather than relying on an outside app or service.

Nothing seems to think that people want this feature, and I can't speak to that demand personally, but I can't say I wanted the feature. Let alone the paid membership to get more accurate and faster transcripts – although you do get free recording and slower transcription as standard.

In more traditional territory, the Ear (3a) does have active noise-cancelling (ANC), and you can expect to get around 6 hours of battery life while it's active before you need to top them up in the case. That's now about par for this sort of earbud.

Sound and Performance

Nothing says that the Ear (3a) comes with a new 12mm dynamic driver. The big difference that you can hear when you wear them compared to older Nothing 'buds is that the bass is definitely boosted – although that might just be a tuning choice, too.

It means that these earbuds do give a pretty good first impression, and before I get into more detail, I'll confirm that for the price, I think their sound quality is pretty much bang on what I'd expect. You get decent clarity and relatively balanced performance across the frequency range.

Take Five is a testing classic for good reason, and its sprightly jazz comes across pretty well, while the more folkish stylings of Animal Fear by Marika Hackman do well too, with the unsettling lower notes coming in decently.

That said, I found I had two different listening experiences in different circumstances. At home in relative quiet, the earbuds were solid. On the move, on public transport and with background noise for the ANC to tune out, it was a far muddier and weaker listen.

The villain here is the ANC, of course, which I won't fly much of a flag for – it's not particularly powerful, and is probably where the budget of the (3a) is most obvious compared to pricier competitors. That's no surprise, but it's still a little disappointing – I thought the Ear (3) performed decently at its higher price tag, for instance.

The on-earbud controls on offer are simple, with each one detecting a squeeze, but lacking any more sophisticated touch controls (like AirPods Pro, for instance). This works well enough, but it does mean you'll need your phone to, for example, adjust the volume of your audio.

Squeezing both at one time activates the "audio snapshot" feature that I mentioned above, recording your audio whether you're on a call or just out and about. The fact that it captures what you're listening to regardless of the source (meaning it could be any video on the web, for example, or a phone call that notifies the other party when it starts) might make it useful for clipping, but I remain unsure why this would be much of a marketing win.

Verdict

Bouncing from high-end earbuds to lower-cost ones is always a bit of a whiplash experience, but the Nothing Ear (3a) softens the blow in some interesting ways.

I really like how the earbuds fit, and they sound extremely solid for this asking price, which immediately makes them a strong pick.

However, subpar active noise-cancelling (ANC) brings the score down, and I don't love all the design choices, with the case particularly warranting a second pass in my view.

For value, the Nothing Ear (3a) are really hard to argue with, but I'd point people towards slightly pricier Ear (3) alternatives to acquire solid upgrades in terms of their sonic experience.

Also Consider

If you're willing to spend just a little more, I'd say the better ANC in the Ear (3) make them a solid upgrade. I much prefer the included case, too, and these 'buds only lack the recording features of the (3a) – which I don't think most people actually want.

If you're committed to staying below the £/$100 mark, then Sennheiser's Accentum True Wireless earbuds are a great counter-option. They're simpler from a design perspective, but I think they sound a little better and have better ANC, too.